Claims Retrospective: Remember, Your Subconsultant’s Work Is Your Work
In Claims onRead moreEngineers frequently subcontract a portion of the design work they are responsible for to a subconsultant. However, engineers should realize they will remain responsible to their client for their subconsultant’s work product. In other words, if their subconsultant’s work is defective or fails to meet the applicable standard of care, the engineer will be liable to the client.
0Beware of Indemnification Clauses–They Can Expand Your Liability and Take Away Protections
Read moreMost engineers have been instructed multiple times to view indemnification clauses that run in their clients’ favor with skepticism and to approach them with caution in contracting. For the most part, the instructions and warnings concern indemnification clauses that can lead to uninsured exposure on the part of engineers. Under typical professional liability policies, there is no coverage for liability, especially the liability of others,…
Although Often Sought by Overreaching Claimants, Betterment Is Typically Not Recoverable
In Claims onRead moreWhen there is a problem with a construction project, the property owner often tries to obtain the highest amount of damages possible. It is not unusual for the owner to calculate damages based on a different, better design with materials or products the owner did not actually contract for, even if the design, materials, or products were initially rejected by the owner as too costly.
Claims Retrospective: Construction Observation versus Construction Inspection—More Than Just Semantics
In Claims, Construction onRead moreDepending on the type of project, an engineer may be involved in construction administration services. These services may include observing the ongoing construction at certain intervals to become generally familiar with the progress on the site.
Be Familiar with the Grounds for Challenging Expert Testimony
In Claims onRead moreLitigation against an engineer will almost always involve expert testimony. Not only because it is required, but to establish the standard of care that is applicable to the expert and any possible breach of that standard.
Claims Retrospective: A Licensing Proceeding Can Be a Precursor to a Claim
In Claims onRead moreIt is hard to think of anything that could be more detrimental to an engineer’s practice than losing his or her engineering license. Therefore, suspension or revocation of one’s license is often (and rightfully so) an engineer’s first concern upon receipt of a licensing complaint.
Are You Talking to Me? Stay-at-Home Orders and Engineering Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic
In Claims onRead moreThe governors of a majority of states across the country have issued stay-at-home, or shelter-in-place, orders in an attempt to limit the spread of COVID-19, instructing everyone to remain in their homes.
Claims Retrospective: A Clear Understanding of the Division of Labor Is Critical to Reducing an Engineer’s Liability on Large Projects
In Engineers onRead moreWe have seen several claims against engineers who work on shop drawings for a specific contractor on large projects.
10 Common Sense Ways to Avoid Being Sued
In Liability onRead moreFor a design professional, a lawsuit or a grievance is a professional hazard. Yet a few simple precautions can minimize that hazard.
Design Professional Negligence? Only an Expert Can Tell
In Claims onRead moreA design professional who has been sued may naturally be concerned about a jury of laypersons sitting in judgment over his or her work, especially when the work was part of a complex, multi-faceted project that may have turned out poorly for a number of reasons, none of which involved the design professional's work.